2.6.5-1.349 ignores selinux=0

[James Morris]

On Tue, 4 May 2004, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:11:26AM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 May 2004, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > 
> > > Interesting - the CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM option is not set in
> > > the kernel configuration in the corresponding kernel SRPM, so the
> > > selinux=0 support is disabled.
> > 
> > I don't know why this is disabled now.  Arjan?
> 
> isn't this obsoleted by the /etc/sysconfig/selinux thing in SysVinit ?

Yes.

> I'm open to turning it back on if there's a good reason, I for sure don't
> have all the visibility into the issues to make that call.

As Stephen mentioned, it will break for people who were using selinux=0.  


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris at redhat.com>