2.6.5-1.349 ignores selinux=0

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:11:26AM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 4 May 2004, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> 
> > Interesting - the CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM option is not set in
> > the kernel configuration in the corresponding kernel SRPM, so the
> > selinux=0 support is disabled.
> 
> I don't know why this is disabled now.  Arjan?

isn't this obsoleted by the /etc/sysconfig/selinux thing in SysVinit ?

I'm open to turning it back on if there's a good reason, I for sure don't
have all the visibility into the issues to make that call.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20040504/b143da38/attachment.sig>