valgrind on FC2 (undefined symbol: __libc_accept)
Ulrich Drepper
drepper at redhat.com
Thu May 13 16:12:26 UTC 2004
Neal Becker wrote:
> Agreed, but valgrind in *very* important, so hopefully libc developers can
> work together wih valgrind developers to prevent breakage.
If you think it's important, then volunteer your time to check that
valgrind doesn't do anything stupid [*]. For me it's one of a gazillion
of programs which are "important". I'm not checking whether a change
will break any of them if the change which is made is valid. Why should
I pick a few programs and treat them special?
[*] Which is, incidently, to a large extend very simple. If a program
uses symbols with version GLIBC_PRIVATE it is using internal interfaces.
And guess what? __libc_accept has this version.
--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list