problem with kernel-2.6.9-1.1_FC2 initrd - can't recreate, but disturbing
Matthew Miller
mattdm at mattdm.org
Thu Nov 11 06:04:42 UTC 2004
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 12:34:44AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Works fine on another test system too. *sigh* -- nothing worse than
> > irreproducible results.
> > What about <http://isec.pl/vulnerabilities/isec-0017-binfmt_elf.txt>?
> that's on my list for tomorrows fun. *sigh*.
:)
> > Oh, and also, is that underscore in the package release just a temporary
> > testing thing? I hope so, 'cause it's really ugly. :)
> Without it, theres no way to distinguish a 2.6.9-1.1 for FC2 from
> a 2.6.9-1.1 from FC3 development (extreme example used, but you get the
> idea). I still occasionally see folks filing bugs against _ancient_
> kernels, so its feasible that it could come from either.
> The alternative would've been something like 2.6.9-1.1.1
I kinda prefer the alternative. Or something like
"kernel-2.6.9-1.2.FC2.src.rpm" like a lot of the other Fedora updates. I'm
afraid the underscore is going to break something somewhere.
I guess it's not a big deal. :)
--
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list