FAQ, GNOME menus, first questions

[Fulko.Hew at sita.aero]

joelbryanster <joelbryanster at gmail.com>@redhat.com on 10/06/2004 08:37:57
AM wrote:


> GNOME is classic, conservative and more organized than KDE, which is
> too contemporary, there's just too many things in KDE that you don't
> need..

I see a religious battle a brewin'   :-)

and IMHO, there are too few things in Gnome that you can configure.  :-(
but thats my opinion, and it might not be yours... thats OK.

But like I said... its a religious battle based on personal
taste.  And if you don't care about this... or that... then
pick what you like and use it.  You can't teach an old dog new
tricks, and you can't (or at least not without a lot of pain)
get a user to switch 'xxx' (apps, window managers, desktop managers,
editors, etc.)