Latest Fedora Core 3 status: kernel testing needed

[Rodolfo J. Paiz]

On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 12:57 -0500, Bryan W. Headley wrote:
> John Dennis wrote:
> >You raise a valid point and to a degree it illustrates two competing
> >approaches to bugs, each camp has their adherents: email vs. central bug
> >database. Each has their advantages and detriments. Recognizing  both
> >styles are valid and that both simultaneously occur suggests a tool that
> >could meld them together would be most welcome.

Odd thought here: what if each bug in Bugzilla had its own little
mailing list? That way any given user could get mail and discuss any
given bug on Earth, without having fedora-list (or any other list)
inundated with "update" messages. Seems like a logical extension of the
current Bugzilla's CC list, no?

If database-driven, this could be quite automatic and easily managed,
and of course it's all archived.

Cheers,

-- 
Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz at simpaticus.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20041021/3a2f74e7/attachment.sig>