First look at fc3rc1

[Matias Féliciano]

Le dimanche 24 octobre 2004 à 09:43 +0100, Paul Nasrat a écrit :
> On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 19:48 +0200, Matias Féliciano wrote:
> > Le samedi 23 octobre 2004 à 12:49 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit :
> 
> > I already state in fedora-config-list that s-c-sc is quite broken. In
> > short, the maintainer say me "go away" (or some like) and request me to
> > file known bugs.
> 
> Please, no-one was telling you to go away

No-one. Humm...

The point is that it's anormal that these _old_ bugs are still in FC3
and not are marked as "ASSIGNED" or in FC3Blocker/FC3Target .

>  - asking you to file bugs

Bugs are filed (since November 1st) and what I get ?
One bug closed with "NOTABUG" :
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134358

> and break things down is a very different thing.
> Communication goes both ways.

Right.

>   This sounds very bitter and hostile,

Yes. "Fedora project is perfect and all criticism are irrelevant" is not
an answers for all problems.

>  and I thought we'd started
> to bridge the misunderstandings here.
> 
> > It's done since 2004-10-01 :
> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134339
> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134321
> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134318
> 
> Yes and those were acknowledged on config list, I'm sure that when
> development unfreezes again things will start to progress, but posts
> that sound like trolls (even if unintentionally) aren't going to help.
> 
> Paul
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20041024/f9c8f644/attachment.sig>