warning to list

Matias Féliciano feliciano.matias at free.fr
Fri Oct 29 08:58:18 UTC 2004


Le jeudi 28 octobre 2004 à 19:32 -0300, Alexandre Oliva a écrit :
> If you read it or not, and if you choose to believe I wrote it or not,
> is up to you.

Your mail is not a kernel or libc or the default background wallpaper. I
don't use evolution as root.
I never install unknown package (or run .exe) attached to a mail.

> Such a key would have to be signed by another Red Hat key to be of any
> value.

Yes, it's better. Is it needed ? I don't think.
btw : "The Fedora Project is not a supported product of Red Hat, Inc."

> I've already exposed my
> arguments, and I intend to step out of this debate now.  I've already
> spent far too long exposing good security practices

Yes.

>  to someone who
> doesn't seem to want to listen.

Perhaps :-)
it's the second time I am arguing for signed rpm. A large majority seem
satisfied with the current rule.
It's time to me to shut up.

Thank for your replies.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20041029/7adcd495/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list