Should Fedora rpms be signed?

Nils Philippsen nphilipp at redhat.com
Fri Oct 29 14:22:58 UTC 2004


On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 09:48 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > This still forces me to use special tools like up2date and yum to access
> > the packages if I want to verify their origins.
> 
> Is this really all that big of a deal?

Sometimes you don't have it, sometimes they don't work (say I botched
python on my system -- "and then?") ;-). I use yum/up2date regularly but
I wouldn't want to have artificial barriers for people who for one or
the other reason want to or can only install with RPM.

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp at redhat.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list