Should Fedora rpms be signed? Yes...resign and rsync...
Matias Féliciano
feliciano.matias at free.fr
Sat Oct 30 19:50:26 UTC 2004
Le samedi 30 octobre 2004 à 13:41 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz a écrit :
> On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 21:31 +0200, Matias Féliciano wrote:
> > Small penalty transfer. But reading 1 Go^UGB of data is a big penalty.
> >
>
> Point taken. On the other hand, how often is the batch of unsigned
> packages that large? Does that happen often?
>
When Red Hat prepare a new official release (FC3T2, FC3, ...) near all
packages are signed. After the release, new packages are not signed.
Unsigned packages grow until a new official release is out.
> Cheers,
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20041030/eb199490/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list