Bacula dependancy of libc5 --whatprovides no clue
Harry Putnam
reader at newsguy.com
Thu Sep 23 17:05:16 UTC 2004
Michal Jaegermann <michal at harddata.com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:23:21AM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Installing the bacula pkgs built from *.src.rpm from sourcforge and I
>> hit one dependancy that a quick yummer won't solve.
>>
>> It says libc5 is required but I can't find anything that provides
>> libc5.
>
> Are you sure that you build that from sources? It is hard to
> imagine how you could get such dependency that way unless that
> "source" actually includes some binary blobs. Otherwise this
> dependency is bogus (very old specs?).
No not from `source' but as I said from `*.src.rpm.'
The ones on sourceforge.
bacula-1.34.6-1.src.rpm
at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727
> http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=libc5
> truly need libc5 this is an archeological computing. It would
> be interesting to know results. :-)
Do you think I could just remove that requires... I don't really know
how but if I follow along the .spec I guess it will be apparent
somewhere.
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list