Bacula dependancy of libc5 --whatprovides no clue

Harry Putnam reader at newsguy.com
Thu Sep 23 17:05:16 UTC 2004


Michal Jaegermann <michal at harddata.com> writes:

> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:23:21AM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Installing the bacula pkgs built from *.src.rpm from sourcforge and I
>> hit one dependancy that a quick yummer won't solve.
>> 
>> It says libc5 is required but I can't find anything that provides
>> libc5.
>
> Are you sure that you build that from sources?  It is hard to
> imagine how you could get such dependency that way unless that
> "source" actually includes some binary blobs.  Otherwise this
> dependency is bogus (very old specs?).

No not from `source' but as I said from `*.src.rpm.'

The ones on sourceforge.
   bacula-1.34.6-1.src.rpm
at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727

> http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=libc5

> truly need libc5 this is an archeological computing.  It would
> be interesting to know results. :-)

Do you think I could just remove that requires... I don't really know
how but if I follow along the .spec I guess it will be apparent
somewhere.





More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list