FC3T2 up2date - <package> is not signed with a GPG signature

[Matias Feliciano]

Le mar 28/09/2004 à 09:57, Michael Jenkins a écrit :
> When doing an up2date on a package, I get the following:
> 
> [root at localhost /etc/sysconfig/rhn]$ up2date hdparm
> 
> Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: fedora-core-rawhide...
> 
> Fetching rpm headers...
> ########################################
> 
> Name                                    Version        Rel
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> hdparm                                  5.7            2
> i386
> 
> 
> Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies...
> ########################################
> hdparm-5.7-2.i386.rpm:      ########################## Done.
> The package hdparm-5.7-2 is not signed with a GPG signature.  Aborting...
> Package hdparm-5.7-2 does not have a GPG signature.
>  Aborting...


It's something i definitely can't understand.
fedora.us => signed
rpm.livna.org => signed
freshrpms.net => signed
Dag => signed
etc

Fedora Core => signed sometimes.

No improvement here sine the beginning of (Fedora|redhat linux) Project !
Right now : 500 packages not signed ! More than 700 Mo !

Fedora have a beautiful feature :
- you can sign the kernel module of your unsigned kernel.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20040928/00194805/attachment.sig>