Is it possible to make Fedora load faster?

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 04:42 -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 09:05:37PM -0400, Richard Hally wrote:
> > are you saying that Fedora is unsuitable for ordinary desktops and (by 
> > extension laptops) unless they have scsi?
> 
> I think some people would prefer to say that "PC's are unsuitable for use
> without real disks" 8)
> 
> In this case the fact that it is I/O not CPU means the requirements to quieten
> such an app are really not handled by nice(2)

also note that the cfq io scheduler makes updatedb and friends a lot
more bareable. CFQ is default in our kernel, but not in kernel.org
kernels, so if the "2.6 is bad with updatedb" notion is based on
kernel.org kernels then I strongly suggest switching those to CFQ.

Also note that both upstream and our kernels are currently missing the
"fix" for updatedb eating your VM that was present in earlier fedora
kernels:

http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/linux-2.6.5-inode-clip.patch

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20050404/2061ac37/attachment.sig>