FC4t2 no good without LILO

[shrek-m at gmx.de]

Jeff Spaleta wrote:

>On 4/12/05, Mike Bird <mgb-fedora at yosemite.net> wrote:
>  
>
>>Historically Grub has been unreliable.  [See bugzillas for Fedora,
>>Debian, GNU, etc, etc.]  If someone tested the latest version of Grub
>>for six months and found no bugs at all, that would not change the fact
>>that historically Grub has been notoriously unreliable.
>>    
>>

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Red+Hat+Linux&component=lilo&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=CLOSED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ASSIGN_TO_PM&bug_status=INVESTIGATE&bug_status=SPEC&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=QA_READY&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=PROD_READY&bug_status=FAILS_QA&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=

>yawn... historically...lilo was removed once before.. in a test
>release i think during fc1 testing phase... it came back because there
>were SPECIFIC issues that were flagged during testing that convinced
>developers to keep lilo in.
>

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2003-October/msg00945.html

or go though the never ending lilo-grub threads.

-- 
shrek-m
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20050413/5f8dd842/attachment.htm>