should i expect "yum update" to work on a fresh fc4t2 install?

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 15:54 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 15:39 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >   theoretically, should this work?
> >
> > Short answer:
> 
> > Maybe.
> >
> > Long answer:
> 
> > Test releases update against Rawhide, and Rawhide isn't always in a
> > consistent state. Updates against it have been known to fail from
> > time to time. Just report the problems in the mailing list and
> > someone will get around to fixing it.
> 
> ok, that's fair.  but, just to be clear, in a perfect world, "yum
> update" is all i should have to do if all the repos are consistent for
> a new install?  (once i turn off gpgcheck)

Assuming you don't have problems induced by packages that were removed,
yes.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20050413/dcff0d40/attachment.sig>