FC4t2 no good without LILO

Guy Fraser guy at incentre.net
Wed Apr 13 21:56:15 UTC 2005


On Tue, 2005-12-04 at 21:33 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 16:03 -0700, Dana Lacoste wrote:
> 
> > if redhat (this is a core issue, they control core) is desiring that
> > lilo be phased out (not a bad idea in itself) and that disk druid
> > be the partition editor of choice (far prettier and easier to use
> > than sfdisk! :) and that other tools that used to work but suck
> > in comparison to modern tools be eliminated, then can we at least
> > make a "deprecated" list and say "these tools will be eliminated from
> > the final distribution [once the test releases are done] so if you
> > need them can you let us know so we can work out the bugs in the tools
> > we want to use instead"?
> 
> lilo is listed as deprecated in the release notes for Fedora Core 1, on
> line 936 of the text version, released in November, 2003.
> 
> Here's a link to the html version of those release notes:
> 
> http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/fedora/linux/core/1/i386/os/RELEASE-NOTES.html
> 
> -- 
>         Peter
Yes and it was before that that people were having problems with 
GRUB but not LILO.

Those problems still exist, but LILO is no longer an option.




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list