A rant regarding LILO and various other related issues

James W. Bennett silverhead at comcast.net
Sat Apr 16 15:17:17 UTC 2005


Timothy Murphy wrote:

>On Fri 15 Apr 2005 19:13, Paul Iadonisi wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>I find the arrogance of the Fedora team in failing to facilitate this
>>>minority rather disturbing.
>>>      
>>>
>>  If you are referring primarily to this thread, then it's crystal clear
>>that the arrogance has been coming from those most vociferously critical
>>of the decision to remove lilo.  You can have your objections to it, but
>>I find it quite disturbing that ANYONE could support calling the
>>developers "morons" and "tards" as somehow justified, despite attempts
>>by those doing the insulting to engage in not-so-clever sophistry in the
>>service of that false justification.
>>    
>>
>
>I have only been following this thread sporadically,
>and wasn't aware that anyone had used those terms.
>I would certainly dissociate myself completely from any talk like that. 
>
>I've actually found the developers I have communicated with
>very willing to help - but of course I did not start by calling them morons!
>
>I was probably wrong to use the word "arrogant" -
>but I was dissapointed that there seemed to be no response
>from the developers to the fairly numerous calls for LILO to be available
>as a choice when installing Fedora.
>I assume it is still a choice when compiling and installing a kernel -
>I mean LILO will be updated if one is using that.
>
>  
>
>>>Incidentally, the interactive option in grub, which you praise,
>>>could be greatly improved;
>>>      
>>>
>>  Possibly, but keep in mind that this has to fit in a pretty small
>>amount of memory, if I'm not mistaken.  There's only so much that can be
>>added due to space constraints.  At least grub HAS a command line.
>>    
>>
>
>As I said, I use grub all the time, and have been saved more than once
>by the grub command line option.
>(In my experience grub is likely to get confused
>if one has IDE and SCSI disks.)
>
>I guess the real weakness of grub is its lack of good documentatiion -
>LILO certainly wins hands down on that score.
>
>  
>
What I can't undestand if someone wants lilo why not download and 
install it and quit complaining.




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list