Wallpaper collections in Core? (was: Re: Fortune Program -Moving->RE: Wanda is broken)
Michael Schwendt
fedora at wir-sind-cool.org
Sat Apr 23 20:05:34 UTC 2005
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:36:10 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 15:26:31 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
> > > Why should a package of quotes be a _Core_ package?
> >
> > Bah. I don't want to argue for moving it back in...
> > But at the same time: Why should a bunch of desktop wallpapers be a
> > _Core_ package?
>
> Good point. Large wallpaper collections do not belong into Core either.
> Only a few examples or Fedora-specific wallpapers to be used for
> demonstrations, themes or default desktop appearance. But not several
> dozens of automatically calculated wallpapers which only occupy space and
> don't belong to any theme either. Those sound very much like "extras".
>
> > If we're going to continue the trend of moving things out of core that
> > many users will want on their fully featured desktop system, then lets
> > take it all the way.
>
> +1
>
Btw, "desktop-backgrounds-extra" is gone already as far as I can see.
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list