Nuisance antispam requests

[Tom Diehl]

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Jesse Keating wrote:

> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 13:59 -0500, Tom Diehl wrote:
>> Yes, but it is expensive processing wise. Set mailman's personalize options to
>> yes and add a custom footer that says something like this: "This message was
>> sent to %(user_delivered_to)s". It works really well but the trade-off is that
>> mailman now has to generate a custom message for each recipient, so processing
>> those messages requires a lot more CPU cycles than before. Not sure if it
>> is worth it or not. You could turn it on when you need to solve a particular
>> problem and then turn it off again.
>>
>
> Problem is that the UOL anti-spam responder doesn't include any part of
> the original email.  Just uses the subject line.

Oh well nevermind then. I had not actually seen one untill I posted the original
message. :-(

Oh, BTW, I thought you were getting a new email address today. ;))

Congrats.

Regards,

Tom