FC4 for servers
seth vidal
skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Sun Feb 6 05:12:18 UTC 2005
> Adding a barebones install option isn't worth it?
>
> Part of it is increasing the flexibility of fedora by allowing it to be
> installed on a wider array of embedded platforms. The other part is just
> install efficiency, not having to waste time removing hundreds of rpms
> which are useless for headless ISP servers.
I think that's part of it, too - fedora's not really targeting the
server infrastructure, is it :)
> In the end it comes down to fedora being flexible and easily
> deployable across a wider array of constrained hardware.
>
> I don't see why fedora should aim for regression vs. RH9 in this respect.
Since you can do the install classes now I don't really see it as a
regression but <shrug> spin it however you'd like.
-sv
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list