yum 2.1.13 in updates-testing

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Sun Feb 6 22:17:20 UTC 2005


On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 11:36:37PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 17:12 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > The latest official upstream release has a major of 0. Probably
> > fedora.us has a development version.

> In apt's case there are good reasons for using the svn-head version,
> biggest reason perhaps being proper SELinux support. Sure, you could
> take just that patch and apply to cnc6 .. but I just happen to know svn-
> head is stable and has bunch of other nice stuff besides just selinux-
> support. :)
> 
> Too bad Gustavo hasn't gotten around to releasing cnc7 :( I've been
> thinking of making an unofficial release out of the current tree but
> probably that would just confuse matters even more. :-/

The fact that the svn server is down doesn't make it easier :(

I launched a request for a final release at apt-rpm.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20050206/51158729/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list