mono in fc3/rawhide/4 ?
Kyrre Ness Sjobak
kyrre at solution-forge.net
Sat Feb 12 19:55:18 UTC 2005
http://www.mono-project.com/about/licensing.html
As far as i can se, the most interesting parts of mono have no patent
troubles. And its all GPL/LGPL/MIT.
So why not? There are a few quite interesting C#/GTK# apps out there
(http://www.gnome.org/projects/beagle/ is one example).
Kyrre
tor, 10.02.2005 kl. 19.07 skrev Paul Iadonisi:
> On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 12:04 -0600, Justin Conover wrote:
> > Are there any redhat devel's working on mono packages for 4 or in
> > there own /people dir?
> > x86
> > x86_64 <--- Please :)
> >
> > Or is there a license reason for not having them or more of a
> > time/test reason if they are not some were.
>
> License problem, I don't think so. On the other hand, if you want to
> talk about the wisdom of it strategically or the possible future patent
> problems, well, maybe on another list ;-).
>
> --
> -Paul Iadonisi
> Senior System Administrator
> Red Hat Certified Engineer / Local Linux Lobbyist
> Ever see a penguin fly? -- Try Linux.
> GPL all the way: Sell services, don't lease secrets
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list