openoffice

[Kyrre Ness Sjobak]

tir, 01.02.2005 kl. 17.52 skrev Rodolfo J. Paiz:
> On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 15:52 -0500, Paul Iadonisi wrote:
> >   Better to pick one of 1) ship an almost-final beta and issue an update
> > to 2.0 when it's released, 2) ship 1.1.x and resign ourselves to that
> > being the version eternally paired with FC4, 3) delay the release of FC4
> > in the hopes that OOo 2.0 will be shipped so as to not cause a
> > significant delay.
> >   Personally, I'm somewhat partial to delay FC4, but only if the delay
> > is, as some one else has suggested, less than 30 days.
> 
> I know I've already said this (in fact, I was the one who suggested <30
> days as a good decision point for delaying FC4), but:
> 
>   1. If <30 days, delay FC4.
>   2. If not, then ship the almost-final beta with FC4 and update to
> final when it's ready.
> 
> Please...

Or provide "openoffice2.org-2.0.i386.rpm" that conflicts openoffice.org
in extras?