newest gimp won't run
Nils Philippsen
nphilipp at redhat.com
Tue Jan 18 09:16:59 UTC 2005
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 23:07 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Is this an FC3 or an FC4 (development/Rawhide) system? I assume the
> > former -- in that case please install the package built for FC3 then
> > (gimp-2.2.2-0.fc3.3 should hit the download servers with then next
> > push), you shouldn't use Rawhide packages on FC3.
>
> Its sort of a hybrid. Mostly rawhide.
> Cat /etc/fedora-release just shows:
> Fedora Core release Rawhide (Rawhide)
>
> I always get confused about the
> version thing. I just update out of rawhide intermittenly. Do you
> know what other packages might be causing the problem?
The only way to reliably find out what may be causing this were to debug
it deeply. A good guess would be gtk2 and related packages, but if you
want to be safe, do this:
0) Start with the gimp, gimp-devel packages
1) find out what packages are required ("rpm -q --requires ...")
2) find out which packages provide these requirements ("rpm -q
--whatprovides ...")
3) update these packages if necessary
4) repeat steps 1 through 3 until all packages are updated that gimp and
gimp-devel require
Alternatively you can update the whole system which is much easier ;-).
> Shouldn't the dependancy routines have returned something about a
> problem?
No, they don't have information about library symbol changes.
> Currently I have 238 packages to update. Any ideas which would be most
> likely to help this?. My system is fairly stable right now. I'd
> like to just update whats needed at the moment for gimp.
If you want a fairly stable system, why do you use Rawhide?
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp at redhat.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list