openoffice

Arjan van de Ven arjanv at redhat.com
Sat Jan 29 16:08:21 UTC 2005


On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 10:52 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 03:44:32AM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > So it's either do a major upgrade (oo1.1.2 -> 2.0) in the middle of FC4, 
> > or put it off till FC5...
> > Or delay FC4 till oo2.0 is released...
> > Did I miss one?
> 
> How about openoffice.org-1.1.2 and openoffice.org2-2.0, both in FC4? :)

that one sucks; you need to parallel install (or "everything" installs
go wonky) and that is not an easy thing for big packages like OOo. Far
better to spend the time that would take on getting 2.0 out faster ;)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20050129/77cba3cf/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list