Rawhide stability

David Nielsen david at lovesunix.net
Sun Jul 10 14:53:40 UTC 2005


søn, 10 07 2005 kl. 10:11 -0400, skrev Jim Cornette:
> >     * From: Mike Chambers <mike netlyncs com>
> >     * To: Fedora Beta <fedora-test-list redhat com>
> >     * Subject: Core 4 + rawhide
> >     * Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 07:12:38 -0500
> > 
> > Anyone running 4 + rawhide and if so, is it pretty stable at this point
> > with all the updates, such as gnome, pup, kernel, etc..?  Yes I know
> > what rawhide is and does, but I'm not currently using rawhide at the
> > moment, like I normally do.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Mike Chambers
> > Madisonville, KY
> 
> 
> 
> If you get a current mirror, apr-devel seems to be the only dep holdout 
> as to the current state of rawhide being updatable. (with my program 
> installations).
> 
> For the kernel, I have problems w/ acpi power-off and with rebooting the 
> system will stay at th rebooting system output on the terminal.
> 
> Pup seemed to update my system if if deps were not resolved. This might 
> have been a one-time glitch, but yum and up2date seem to prevent package 
> insallation if deps are not resolved.
> 
> If you have a lot of devel packages installed, deps might be more 
> noticable. Overall, I think things are running pretty stable.

Aside http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309908 and evolution
crashing when you close mail windows (I except this is a known issue),
I'm inclined to agree that Rawhide is oddly stable.

- David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20050710/6b65daa8/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list