rawhide report: 20050628 changes
Justin Conover
justin.conover at gmail.com
Tue Jun 28 14:03:27 UTC 2005
On 6/28/05, Justin Conover <justin.conover at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/28/05, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 6/28/05, Justin Conover <justin.conover at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 6/28/05, Build System <buildsys at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Please fix so I can have my cup of java :D
> >
> > First let me point you to the the new feature of the build report that
> > summarizes the broken deps for each arch that rawhide builds for. I
> > don't see that dep issue listed for any arch. Nor do I encounter any
> > such error on my x86 rawhide box.
> >
> > Perhaps you have created a localized inconsistency on your system. Is
> > this a 64bit system? Are there 32bit and 64bit flavors of these
> > packages on your system?
> >
> > -jef
> >
> x86 rawhide box,
>
> I did a clean install of fc4 about a week ago and then upgraded to
> rawhide and now I can't get my java fix.
>
> It does show broken deps for many of the arch's but doesn't list i386
>
> java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-devel - 1.4.2.0-11jpp.noarch requires ecj
>
Figured it out, apparently I had some hiding fruit.
# rpm -qa | grep java
gcc-java-4.0.0-13
java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-40jpp_31rh
yum remove java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-40jpp_31rh
Running Transaction
Removing : jessie ######################### [1/2]
Removing : java-1.4.2-gcj-compat ######################### [2/2]
yum groupinstall "Eclipse"
is proceeding as planned :D
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list