Just an idea

nodata fedora at nodata.co.uk
Thu Jun 2 17:18:06 UTC 2005


On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 12:36 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 6/2/05, Paul <paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Any way of knowing what is in the next days build? 
> 
> no.. there is absolutely no way to for sure to read the future. 
> Unless of course you mean.. 3 minutes into the future. If there was a
> sure way to know several hours ahead of time what was going to be
> built in time for the push to rawhide... we'd always have the
> clustering modules in sync with kernels. We already know from list
> archive discussion that the clustering modules package maintainer has
> a script to watch for new kernel builds...but it doesn't always catch
> late-breaking kernel builds in time to make sure the cluster modules
> are built for that kernel.
> 
> > Reason I'm asking is
> > I know new versions of OOo are due as well as other bits and pieces and
> > it would be quite nice to know what's in the next days build. 
> 
> It's nice to know what I'm getting for christmas the day before too.
> Makes it very easy for me to prepare my mock 'I'm so happy you got me
> a wallet' face
> 
> > also cut down on traffic with people saying "xyz" requires "abc".
> 
> The build reports we get now.. don't help with this.. they don't
> detail the dependancies. There is no way knowing a day ahead which
> packages are going to be in the tree will catch all possible dep
> problems, unless you are also told exactly which deps each package
> has.
> And trust me.. you don't want to get a flat file listing of all deps
> to review.
> 
> What would help, assuming people are reading the build reports... is
> if the build reports also included some output of repoclosure from
> yum-utils.  This should give everyone reading the build reports a
> headsup of which packages have some sort of dep problem.  Though I'm
> not sure how many people are actually reading the build reports.
> 
> -jef
> 

If you're going to add more detail to the build reports, can the more
detailed one be labelled, or sent to a separate list?
I skim read the build reports, but the prospect of even more to read
worries me.




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list