Fedora Core 4 delayed until June 13

[amazing powers of observation]

  just cause itts called fedora does not a red hat make . sure fedora is 
a hat but it brings up images of indiana jones and that type of bleeding 
edge adventures   see where i am going with this ?
Jim Cornette wrote:

> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 14:37 -0700, Jared Buck wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 13:02 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Due to some unforseen complications, Fedora Core 4 is now
>>>>> scheduled for general availability on June 13. We apologize for
>>>>> the inconvenience.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's all right :)  Better to ensure most of the bugs are gone than
>>>> release something buggy, right?  A later release date isn't a problem,
>>>> FC3 was released a few weeks later than scheduled, wasn't it?
>>>
>>>
>>> Apparently nothing to do with bugs, just lawyers...
>>
>>
>>
>> and the significant difference there would be ... ?
>>
>> rday
>>
>
> Picking a name other than Fedora for the project would not change this 
> project. Since the project is still associated with Red Hat and the 
> project name did not get me interested, but the fact that this took 
> off from merging resources from Fedora for providing desired products 
> that were too risky for inclusion in RHL. I argued for the inclusion i 
> RHL of mp3 players but could live with a name change for the project.
>
> Progressive Linux Project
> Windoze Alternative Project
> or any other name that just lets one know what website to go to is 
> better than feeding a pool of people so intrigued by the word fedora 
> that they feel that they have exclusive rights to the word. I never 
> heard of the referenced company before this warring over a word.
>
> Jim
>
>