ext3 compiled-in vs module in FC4
Dave Jones
davej at redhat.com
Mon May 23 20:45:08 UTC 2005
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 03:33:33PM -0400, Tim Taranov wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I was wondering why FC4 has ext3 as a kernel module rather than having
> it compiled into the kernel?
>
> The reason I'm asking is because I encountered an issue with booting
> FC4 from a raid volume with ext3 compiled as a module (the default
> configuration) - the kernel would panic after not being able to mount
> /. After I rebuilt the kernel to have the ext3 compiled-into the
> kernel, the booting problem went away (my /boot and / are ext3-based,
> running off a h/w raid controller based volume).
>
> I was using the default FC4 test 3 at the time - I haven't tried it
> with the latest kernel, but I suspect the results may be the same.
If your initrd is made correctly, it shouldn't matter which way
its built.
Dave
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list