Dlink DWL-G510 and ndiswrapper - not working
Steven Stern
subscribed-lists at sterndata.com
Sun May 15 16:09:33 UTC 2005
Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 05:18:34PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 14 May 2005, Steven Stern wrote:
>>
>>>Dan Williams wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 14 May 2005, Steven Stern wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 10:03 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I've followed the standard recipe for installing ndiswrapper and
>>>>>>>activating the D-Link DWL G510 card.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>you're probably better of not using ndiswrapper.. kernel people might
>>>>>>actually care about bugs you report then :)
>>>>>
>>>>>I'd love to not use it, but I can't find anything that tells me how to
>>>>>use the existing wireless network card without it. If you have any
>>>>>useful suggestions, I'm interested.
>>>>
>>>>Is it a G510 revision A, or a G510 revision B?
>>>
>>>It's a Revision B.
>>
>>Revision B cards appear to use the Atheros chipset, which has drivers for linux
>>that work quite well:
>>
>>http://madwifi.sf.net
>>
>>The drivers there you'll have to compile yourself, since they are not in the
>>kernel (and won't be, since they use some non-open-source binary bits).
>>
>>Alternatively, you could grab an RPM and rebuild the RPM (since the kernel
>>module must match the running kernel):
>>
>>http://dl.atrpms.net/production/sources/fedora-3-i386/atrpms/madwifi-0.9.4.12-16.rhfc3.at.src.rpm
>
>
> There are also packages for FC4t3 and rawhide under
>
> http://atrpms.net/dist/fc4/madwifi/
>
> ATrpms is officially tracking rawhide since FC4t3 :)
>
> Currently packages for 1286, 1287, 1290 are up and for 1303 are being
> uploaded.
>
> If you point to the fc4 repo, you can use
>
> yum install madwifi-kmdl-`uname -r` madwifi
>
> and you'll have the bits installed.
>
>
>>As root, do:
>>
>>1) rpm -Uhv /path/to/madwifi-0.9.4.12-16.rhfc3.at.src.rpm
>>2) cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS
>>3) rpmbuild -ba madwifi.spec
>>4) cd ../RPMS/i386
>>5) rpm -Uhv madwifi*.rpm
>>
>>Reboot.
>>
>>Dan
>>
>
>
Thanks very much to you and Dan.
--
Steve
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list