rawhide report: 20050516 changes

[shrek-m at gmx.de]

>My point is that those that read the list will know that a empty list of
>updates packages _probably_ means that no packages were updated, but it is
>also likely that something went wrong. We won't know - we'll assume that
>it means no packages are updated.
>Those that are new to the list will see the cryptic e-mail and wonder if
>something is broken. Why not fix it?
>
>If no packages are updated, why announce it to the list?
>

than your question could be:
  hey, where is the daily rawhide-report ?
  this probably means that something is broken or no packages are updated ?

-- 
shrek-m