Fedora Core 4 Test Update: kernel-2.6.14-1.1633_FC4

Marc Schwartz MSchwartz at mn.rr.com
Fri Nov 4 13:42:06 UTC 2005


On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 23:21 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 05:31:53PM -0600, Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote:
> 
>  > >From kernel-2.6.12-1.1456_FC4:
>  > 
>  > $ cat /proc/i8k
>  > 1.0 A38 ? 54 -22 1 -22 79260 -1 2
>  > 
>  > 
>  > >From kernel-2.6.14-1.1633_FC4:
>  > 
>  > $ cat /proc/i8k
>  > 1.0 A38  52 -22 1 -22 77340 -1 2
> 
> Ok, that looks like unintentional breakage. I've brought this
> up upstream. Will try and get any resulting fix backported to FC4
> when that appears.
> 
>  > What is different is the field that should show the service tag ID for
>  > the laptop. This is the '?' in the first instance (3rd field) and
>  > appears to be missing in the second.
>  > 
>  > This would perhaps explain the SEGFAULT, since in reviewing the code in
>  > i8krellm.c for the __i8k_get_proc_info() function, there are a series of
>  > strcpy's, parsing the fields from the result of getting the /proc/i8k
>  > info.
> 
> That code is really quite icky, and screams "scanf" to me.
> Whilst that kernel interface *shouldnt* change, things like this
> do happen, and it could have taken defensive action instead of
> being as fragile as it is.


Great! Thanks for your assistance here Dave.

Thanks also to Ernest for his offlist guidance.

Best regards,

Marc





More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list