[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rawhide report: 20050913 changes

John Ellson wrote:
Willem Riede wrote:

On 09/13/2005 10:10:15 AM, Build System wrote:
* Tue Sep 13 2005 Dave Jones <davej redhat com>
- 2.6.14-rc1

* Mon Sep 12 2005 Dave Jones <davej redhat com>
- 2.6.13-git12

On my Opteron the x86_64 kernel panics early in the boot process
[some event preceeded this but is scrolled off screen to fast to read]:

Code: 0f 0b 68 3b 96 37 80 c2 96 02 eb 20 48 8b 02 48 83 c2 18 48
RIP <ffffffff801688f1>{kmem_find_general_cachep+10} RSP <ffffffff80567ee8>
<0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!

Call Trace:<ffffffff80134c51>{panic+133} <ffffffff80354245>{spin_unlock_irq+9}
<ffffffff80353bd3>{__down_read+50} <ffffffff8010f2da>{show_stack+202}
<ffffffff803541e8>{_spin_lock_irqsave+9} <ffffffff80203011>{__up_read+19}
<ffffffff801376bf>{do_exit+149} <ffffffff80259662>{do_unblank_screen+45}
<ffffffff8010f7bc>{default_do_nmi+0} <ffffffff8010ff63>{do_invalid_op+163}
<ffffffff80568753>{start_kernel+323} <ffffffff8056821d>{_sinittext+541}

I hope I have better luck with tomorrow's kernel... Willem Riede.

Nope. I'm having the same problem with 1553 today. (at least, sounds like the same, but I haven't
versified the details of the panic).

I'm back to 1549  on x86_64

Also, 155[23] fail on all i386 boxes  unless I start with selinux=0

I tried kernel versions from FC4 and they failed unless selinux=0 was passed to the kernel. I even went into runlevel 1 with selinux=0 and running fixfiles relabel. The halt that I get with selinux enabled is the ID"1" on tty1, ID "2" on tty2 .....tty6

Before relabeling, I got the lockup during detecting hardware when booting.



C'mon! political protest! sheesh. Where's that anarchist spirit? ;-)
        -- Decklin Foster

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]