Re: kernel define URB_ASYNC_UNLINK missing

[Dave Jones <davej redhat com>]

On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 06:16:13PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:

 > 	This is vis-a-vis the kudzu conflict vs 2.6.13 kernels being beat on
 > over on the fedora-devel list.  On what side of the fence will this
 > 2.6.13.2 kernel fall?  Does it conflict with the kudzu currently with
 > the 2.6.12 kernels? Will this 2.6.13.2 kernel provide us with a
 > stepping stone past the kernel <-> kudzu catch-22 critical dependency?
 > The 2.6.13-1.1567 kernel (which is really the 2.6.14rc2 kernel)
 > conflicts with the existing kudzu.  The kudzu from rawhide conflicts
 > with any kernel < 2.6.13.  Sooo...  Is it real or is it memorex?  Is it
 > really < 2.6.13 or is it really < 2.6.14rc2?  What happens in the
 > boundary condition we appear to be approaching?

The conflict only exists in rawhide. The 2.6.13.2 kernel is an FC4 update,
so completely unrelated.

		Dave