FC5T2 ready for even a test release?
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Fri Feb 3 08:38:20 UTC 2006
George R Goffe wrote:
>Howdy,
>
>As long as we're still talking about install everything. I tried
>selecting MANUALLY(!) all the pkgs available but did not get a
>successful installation. At Rahuls suggestion I installed just the
>base fc5t2. I then used the atilla the hun approach with installing
>ALL of the rpms on the cd's. I'm sure there's an easier way to do
>this... My point though is that it appeared that the cman and a
>couple of other pkgs WOULD NOT INSTALL due to missing dependencies
>that were NOT on the cd's. It was somewhat painfull to do and I have
>since lost the file with the pkg names in it. Sigh...
>
>
>
This GFS related unsatisfied dependencies is clearly indicated in the
end of the daily rawhide report.
>I think this is yet another reason to have the install everything
>"button".
>
>
Broken package dependencies can only fixed by updating the actual
packages. Everything installations are not going to resolve those.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list