ATI driver for X.org 7.0.0?

[Chris Chabot]

LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose fglrxinfo
libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 8.21.7 fglrx (screen 0)
libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so
libGL error: dlopen /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so failed
(/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory)
libGL error: unable to find driver: fglrx_dri.so
libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 8.21.7 fglrx (screen 0)
libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so
libGL error: dlopen /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so failed
(/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory)
libGL error: unable to find driver: fglrx_dri.so
display: :0.0  screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
OpenGL version string: 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.4.1)


Seems its trying to find its .so's in old XFree86 locations, not new
xorg 7 ones :-)



On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 09:08 -0500, Jorge Torres wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Set the enviroment variable LIBGL_DEBUG to verbose and run fgl_glxgears
> or fglrxinfo again.
> 
> $ LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose fglrxinfo
> 
> Please post the output.
> 
> 
> ----
> Jorge Torres
> 
> 
> 
> 
> El dom, 05--2006 a las 00:36 +1100, Steven Haigh escribió:
> > On 04/02/2006, at 10:36 PM, Markku Kolkka wrote:
> > 
> > > Steven Haigh kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika lauantai, 4.
> > > helmikuuta 2006 04:44):
> > >> Now, if I run fgl_glxgears -info, I get:
> > >> Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
> > >> GL_RENDERER = Mesa GLX Indirect
> > >> GL_VERSION = 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.4.1)
> > >> GL_EXTENSIONS = *snipped the million lines :P*
> > >> X Error of failed request: GLXUnsupportedPrivateRequest
> > >>    Major opcode of failed request: 143 (GLX)
> > >>    Minor opcode of failed request: 16 (X_GLXVendorPrivate)
> > >>    Serial number of failed request: 29
> > >>    Current serial number in output stream: 31
> > >>
> > >> This makes me feel that it's falling back to Mesa instead of
> > >> GL being handled by the ATI driver. Does this sound correct?
> > >
> > > Yes. See the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file to see why hardware
> > > acceleration is failing.
> > 
> > This is the problem - I can't see anywhere that says it's failing. in  
> > fact, in part of Xorg.0.log, I see:
> > (II) fglrx(0): Acceleration enabled
> > (II) fglrx(0): X context handle = 0x1
> > (II) fglrx(0): [DRI] installation complete
> > (II) fglrx(0): Direct rendering enabled
> > (II) Loading extension FGLRXEXTENSION
> > (II) Loading extension ATITVOUT
> > (II) fglrx(0): Interrupt handler installed at IRQ 11.
> > 
> > Yet when I launch fireglcontrolpanel, it still shows Mesa to be the  
> > OpenGL library. The output of fglrxinfo also backs this up.
> > 
> > Outputs are at:
> > http://www.crc.id.au/fedora/Xorg.0.log
> > http://www.crc.id.au/fedora/fglrxinfo
> > 
> > In use config at:
> > http://www.crc.id.au/fedora/xorg.conf
> > 
> > The module 'fglrx' is loaded into the kernel, and all is sweet  
> > there... I'm outta ideas on this one :(
> > 
> > --
> > Steven Haigh
> > 
> > Email: netwiz at crc.id.au
> > Web: http://www.crc.id.au
> > Phone: (03) 9017 0597 - 0412 935 897
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20060204/285bddb0/attachment.sig>