mono? true?
David Malcolm
dmalcolm at redhat.com
Tue Jan 10 17:05:02 UTC 2006
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 10:25 -0500, D Canfield wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> >>>
> >> As of last night I was *so* frustrated with fc... particularly
> >> because my ability to use tomboy comes and goes as core, extras, and
> >> 3rd party mono packages break and fix each other; having to manually
> >> apply the sata-suspend patch with every new kernel; and the
> >> perpetually broken state of gnome-pilot (currently the evo conduits)
> >> in fc
> >
> >
> > Is Evolution conduits still broken in rawhide?. Do you have a bug
> > report on this?
> >
> The evolution conduits are not being built (they're turned off in the
> spec file). There is a comment in the changelog from a while back
> saying the conduits were being turned off "for now". I tried turning
> them back on locally and they failed to compile. This has to be
> something specific to the FC build environment though, as the evo 2.5.3
> conduits were built (and working beautifully I might add) in the ubuntu
> beta when I tested it last week.
>
> Is it still appropriate to file a bug if the maintainer turned them off
> intentionally? I'll happily do anything I can to help nudge this
> along... not being able to sync my Treo has been the sole reason I've
> had a windows box sitting next to my laptop at work for the past year.
>
DC already nudged me about it, but for the sake of the mailing list, the
relevant bug is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175160
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list