FC5T2 ready for even a test release?

[Rahul Sundaram]

Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>
>  
>
>>On 1/22/06, gb spam <gbofspam at gmail.com> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>We value everything installs, it works for us and jumping through
>>>hoops (write web apps; managing kickstart files; using kickstart
>>>during installs - does it still not tell you if it can't load the
>>>ks file until you get to a point in the install where your options
>>>haven't been selected?) is "less convenient" than clicking a check
>>>box during install.
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>So let me get this straight.. nothing other than a single check box
>>during install is going to satify you?  There is no room to
>>compromise? You've drawn the line in the sand and you are holding
>>your breath?  That's unfortunate.
>>    
>>
>
>um ... no.  what's unfortunate is your condescending attitude towards
>folks who are pointing out that they *like* the concept of an
>everything install.  that would include folks like *me*, by the way.
>does that mean you're going to insult me as well?
>
>  
>
Can you explain to me a few different use cases which makes it a good 
argument to be available by default other than selecting package groups, 
kickstart and using yum . Please explain with rationale instead of just 
stating your preference.


-- 
Rahul 

Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers