FC5 T2
John Summerfied
debian at herakles.homelinux.org
Mon Jan 16 13:05:09 UTC 2006
Andy Burns wrote:
> Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>
>> That
>> way the mirrors are syncing potentially smaller changes between
>> release candidates into the release candidate tree
>
>
> Off at a slight tangent, but it struck me the other day that rsync is
> probably less efficient at mirroring rawhide *because* the RPMs are
> compressed, therefore a small change to a package's source will change
> the binary contents drastically enough to defeat the delta compression,
> I suppose with xorg being split up that helps, but ooo/tetex/eclipse etc
> are still significant chunks. I hardly suppose having an uncompressed
> form of RPM file would be welcome though ...
>
I've recently been thinking I could update exploded source trees faster
than tarballs.
SUSE has patch rpms, but I've not explored the savings they (presumably)
yield. Someone should tho:-)
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa at computerdatasafe.com.au Z1aaaaaaa at computerdatasafe.com.au
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/
do not reply off-list
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list