kernel-2.6.15-1.1861_FC5.src.rpm

[D Canfield]

Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 04:44:45PM -0700, Don Springall wrote:
>  > Since this source file is 2.6.16-rc1-git1 plus redhat patches should it not 
>  > be named Kernel-2.6.16-1.1861_FC5.src.rpm and be built into  
>  > /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.16 by rpmbuild ?
>
> No. The final 'x' part of 2.6.x in the version string only gets
> bumped when the tarball the rpm is based on is 2.6.16
>
> 		Dave
>
>   
And just to spell things out a bit more, this seems consistent with FC 
Test numbering... 4.90 is a (post-4) development release of FC 5 just as 
2.6.15-xxxxx is a post-2.6.15 development release of 2.6.16.  The 
changelog has been great about noting which version of the kernel a 
release is actually based on, so for those that really care, the info is 
readily available via rpm -q --changelog.

DC