FC5T2 ready for even a test release?

[Rahul Sundaram]

Nils Philippsen wrote:

>On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 20:03 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>  
>
>>No it doesnt. I made my argument with detailed rationale on why I 
>>believe it is not useful in general cases. If you disagree with me, feel 
>>free to do so but I would like to hear a detailed set of use cases that 
>>make it a convincing enough argument for Anaconda to support it for end 
>>users apart from Kickstart capability.
>>    
>>
>
>What most people complain about here is AFAICS that we completely
>removed (instead of just hid) an option they valued and that was a well
>tested (by them), supposedly no-brainer sort of code path, very much
>unlikely to give any problems down the road.
>
You are thinking about this from the development perspective. The code 
base is a no brainer but from the support perspective the number of 
issues that a everything installation has caused is innumerous. 
Specifically in Fedora, try doing a everythings installation of FC4 and 
try running yum update. Watch GFS module packages fail.

-- 
Rahul 

Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers