FC5T2 ready for even a test release?

[Richard Hally]

Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 14:17 -0500, Richard Hally wrote:
>> It is a poor design decision to remove a useful feature because that 
>> feature uncovers other problems that should be fixed rather than covered 
>> up.  
> 
> We're not talking about removing it.  When the installer underpinnings
> changed to yum, the everything code would have to be written again.  The
> old code doesn't work, the new code doesn't exist.  We're talking about
> re-adding the feature back in, not dropping an existing feature.
> 
> 
Yes, I was referring to a 'feature sets' feature (capability) not 
whether the code was there or not.