Another YUM problem on FC6T1

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 01:07 -0700, Thomas Taylor wrote:
> 
> In the repo files, it I substitute the number "5" for $releasever, it
> works 
> just fine.  Where does yum (system) get the $releasever variable from?
> Is it 
> being parsed properly?  I'm assuming "5" would be the correct value to
> use as 
> it would be the truncated result of "5.9" and there are no "6's" in
> the list.

The Fedora Release package delivered with Test 1 only enabled
development and extras-development which both point to a development/
dir rather than a release versioned dir.  Did you make a change?

> When I attempt to do an echo of the $releasever, it returns nothing.
> 

It is figured out by looking at rpm query output of the package that
provides 'redhat-release'.  In fedora land, this is the fedora-release
package.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20060623/b2b91af6/attachment.sig>