unsubscribe

Wed Jun 21 16:03:56 UTC 2006

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-test-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-test-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of
fedora-test-list-request at redhat.com
Sent: 21 June 2006 17:00
To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
Subject: fedora-test-list Digest, Vol 28, Issue 36

Send fedora-test-list mailing list submissions to
	fedora-test-list at redhat.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	fedora-test-list-request at redhat.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
	fedora-test-list-owner at redhat.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of fedora-test-list digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Announcing Fedora Core 6 Test 1 (5.90) (Jesse Keating)
   2. Re: Announcing Fedora Core 6 Test 1 (5.90) (Alan Cox)
   3. Re: Announcing Fedora Core 6 Test 1 (5.90) (Jesse Keating)
   4. Re: Announcing Fedora Core 6 Test 1 (5.90) (tony)
   5. Re: Announcing Fedora Core 6 Test 1 (5.90) (Alan Cox)
   6. Re: Announcing Fedora Core 6 Test 1 (5.90) (Jesse Keating)
   7. Re: XFCE4.4 (Kevin Fenzi)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:15:59 -0400
From: Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Announcing Fedora Core 6 Test 1 (5.90)
To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
Cc: fedora-devel-list at redhat.com, fedora-list at redhat.com,
	fedora-announce-list at redhat.com
Message-ID: <1150902959.7049.30.camel at dhcp83-49.boston.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 10:55 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> the first civilian to reach space

Seems my copy got a bit muddled.  Mike Melville was the first civilian to
reach space in privately funded and developed space craft, rather than a
government funded vessel.

RE: http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0922173.html

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20060621/fec0da
77/attachment.bin

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:18:26 -0400
From: Alan Cox <alan at redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Announcing Fedora Core 6 Test 1 (5.90)
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
	<fedora-devel-list at redhat.com>
Cc: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
	<fedora-test-list at redhat.com>, fedora-list at redhat.com,
cim at redhat.com
Message-ID: <20060621151826.GA23531 at devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:12:04AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Currently there are no i586 kernels.  The 'i386' reference was to the 
> family of processors vs ppc vs x86-64 vs s390, not the subarch of i386 
> vs i586 vs i686.

Ok so for older systems or VIA systems its not worth downloading test 1 ?

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:31:32 -0400
From: Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Announcing Fedora Core 6 Test 1 (5.90)
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
	<fedora-devel-list at redhat.com>
Cc: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
	<fedora-test-list at redhat.com>, fedora-list at redhat.com,
cim at redhat.com
Message-ID: <1150903892.7049.34.camel at dhcp83-49.boston.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 11:18 -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ok so for older systems or VIA systems its not worth downloading test 
> 1 ?

That is correct Alan, as you already knew from earlier conversations.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20060621/401748
42/attachment.bin

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:34:56 +0200
From: tony <tony at tgds.net>
Subject: Re: Announcing Fedora Core 6 Test 1 (5.90)
To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
	<fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1150904096.3221.179.camel at hush.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15

Le mercredi 21 juin 2006 à 11:31 -0400, Jesse Keating a écrit :
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 11:18 -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Ok so for older systems or VIA systems its not worth downloading 
> > test 1 ?
> 
> That is correct Alan, as you already knew from earlier conversations.

Thanks Alan I was about to download to my hush

Tony

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:49:29 -0400
From: Alan Cox <alan at redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Announcing Fedora Core 6 Test 1 (5.90)
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
	<fedora-devel-list at redhat.com>
Cc: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
	<fedora-test-list at redhat.com>, fedora-list at redhat.com,
cim at redhat.com
Message-ID: <20060621154929.GA26709 at devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:31:32AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 11:18 -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Ok so for older systems or VIA systems its not worth downloading 
> > test 1 ?
> 
> That is correct Alan, as you already knew from earlier conversations.

Well I assumed it was, but then there was nothing to warn people about the
test1 CDs so I thought I should check because it seemed unlikely it had been
sorted for test1, and even more unlikely that the announce would neglect to
mention this detail

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:55:28 -0400
From: Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Announcing Fedora Core 6 Test 1 (5.90)
To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
	<fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
	<fedora-devel-list at redhat.com>, fedora-list at redhat.com
Message-ID: <1150905329.7049.39.camel at dhcp83-49.boston.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 11:49 -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> Well I assumed it was, but then there was nothing to warn people about 
> the test1 CDs so I thought I should check because it seemed unlikely 
> it had been sorted for test1, and even more unlikely that the announce 
> would neglect to mention this detail

It wasn't sorted on purpose, and yes I forgot to mention this little
wrinkle.

Perhaps we can get a show of hands of all the people who actually care about
Fedora on i586 systems...

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20060621/1ec777
c8/attachment.bin

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:53:24 -0600 (MDT)
From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin-redhat-beta at scrye.com>
Subject: Re: XFCE4.4
To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
Message-ID: <20060621.095324.03534179.kevin at scrye.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Michael Reilly <paul.m.reilly at verizon.com> writes:

Paul> One of the ways I would like to give back to Fedora is to help out 
Paul> with Xfce, in particular by testing xfce4.4 in rawhide.  As near 
Paul> as I can tell the development rpms are still xfce4.2 based. Based 
Paul> on that, it would appear to be more of a development effort than a 
Paul> testing effort.  Correct?  And if so, can someone suggest a 
Paul> developer to work with in getting xfce4.4 ready for FC6?

Greetings Paul. 

I am the Xfce maintainer in extras. :) 

I haven't pushed Xfce4.4b1 into rawhide yet. The issue being that Xfce isn't
on a time based release schedule. It's ready when it's ready. I don't want
to push 4.4beta in now only to have 4.4 final not out by the time FC6 is
released. That would have us shipping a beta in a release branch. ;( 

There is rumblings on the Xfce lists that 4.4beta2 might come out this
coming weekend. After that they typically do a rc1 and rc2 release before
final. I will probibly push rc1 or rc2 into devel once it's out. 

In the short term tho I am looking at pushing out a new version of exo and
Terminal. Those packages are pretty self contained, and the new exo is
needed for Thunar (the filemanager in 4.4). 

If you are interested in testing those out you can grab some rpms
here: 
http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/new-exo/ 

and add comments/discussion at: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195435

Paul> Thanks,
Paul> -pmr

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20060621/791e2f
13/attachment.bin

------------------------------

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

End of fedora-test-list Digest, Vol 28, Issue 36
************************************************