fedora-test-list Digest, Vol 25, Issue 32

Leslie Satenstein lsatenstein at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 8 15:25:49 UTC 2006


Should not mount from Fedora know about  LVM partitions and how to  setup access?

Yes, you are right, both disks have LVM file systems.



4. Re: Silly thing like a mount command appears to not be
      working correctly? (Richard Hally)
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 21:04:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Leslie Satenstein 
Subject: Silly thing like a mount command appears to not be working
 correctly?
To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
Message-ID: <20060308050413.78721.qmail at web30207.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Here is the scenario

Fedora core4 on a dedicated 80 gig drive /hdb.  (All install defaults taken)

Fedora core5 on a 200 gig dedicated drive. (All defaults taken)

Using system bios, I can boot from either drive.

I can mount the boot partition from either system to the other, but I cannot mount the data partitions.

My commands were (from root)

mkdir /other   (on each hard drive)


mount -t ext3 /dev/hda?  /other
where I tried ? from 7 all the way to 1. On the core4 system, 
The system could not find values of /dev/hda7 through 3 . Refused /dev/hda2 and showed me the boot partition for /dev/hda1


On the core5 test3 system using the default values as set up by annaconda at install time, I could see the boot partition on /dev/hdb1 but no other partition.
Is there something I am doing wrong? I tried many flavours of xxx for the  mount -t xxxx (auto, ext2, ext3) , eluding -t parameter. 

Your test against a vanilla corex drive would be appreciated.

Leslie

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20060307/947695cc/attachment.html

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:16:55 -0500
From: Richard Hally 
Subject: Re: Silly thing like a mount command appears to not be
 working correctly?
To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
 
Message-ID: <440E68C7.40605 at mindspring.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Leslie Satenstein wrote:
> Here is the scenario
> 
> Fedora core4 on a dedicated 80 gig drive /hdb.  (All install defaults taken)
> 
> Fedora core5 on a 200 gig dedicated drive. (All defaults taken)
> 
> Using system bios, I can boot from either drive.
> 
> I can mount the boot partition from either system to the other, but I 
> cannot mount the data partitions.
> 
> My commands were (from root)
> 
> mkdir /other   (on each hard drive)
> 
> 
> mount -t ext3 /dev/hda?  /other
> where I tried ? from 7 all the way to 1. On the core4 system,
> The system could not find values of /dev/hda7 through 3 . Refused 
> /dev/hda2 and showed me the boot partition for /dev/hda1
> 
> 
> On the core5 test3 system using the default values as set up by 
> annaconda at install time, I could see the boot partition on /dev/hdb1 
> but no other partition.
> Is there something I am doing wrong? I tried many flavours of xxx for 
> the  mount -t xxxx (auto, ext2, ext3) , eluding -t parameter.
> 
> Your test against a vanilla corex drive would be appreciated.
> 
> Leslie
> 
Your problem may have to do with the fact that default installs use LVM 
for partitions other than /boot.
 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20060308/e14eedb4/attachment.htm>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list