Proposals for mono-basic and monodoc

Sat Nov 4 23:29:59 UTC 2006

On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 16:26 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> [...] Regardless of the OIN, if Microsoft folks help to add 
> functionality to Mono, it will be tainted.  I certainly don't want to look at 
> any code that might be tainted.

I may regret suggesting this; but if comes down to it - could Red Hat
fork and maintain/enhance Mono from as it currently stands? That way,
any Microsoft-made contributions would not harm it or Fedora. 

Alas, I've become an avid proponent of both Tomboy and Beagle. I'd
really hate to have them suddenly removed without good reason. :|
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20061104/7666aaa1/attachment.sig>