Proposals for mono-basic and monodoc

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:52:03PM -0500, Michel Salim wrote:
> On 11/4/06, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:
> >On Saturday 04 November 2006 08:13, Paul wrote:
> >> What is the depth of feeling for moving mono-basic into extras and
> >> monodoc into core?
> >
> >Personally, given Novells deal with Microsoft, I'd rather see mono get 
> >purged
> >from Fedora all together.  Any future developments in Mono from Novell and
> >their partners Microsoft have far too much risk of being tainted for my
> >tastes.
> >
> Should we look into getting Tracker into extras, just in case we need
> to pull Beagle out?
> 
> http://www.gnome.org/~jamiemcc/tracker/

If Tracker is a useful app for people then it should be in Extras
regardless of whether we have Beagle or not. There's plenty of people
who don't like various aspects of Beagle, but whom still want that kind
of functionality.

Regards,
Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=|