Proposals for mono-basic and monodoc

[Jesse Keating]

On Saturday 04 November 2006 12:22, David Nielsen wrote:
> Let's just wait and hear what Legal has to say about this first, I'd be
> mighty upset if Banshee and Beagle was taken from me without proper
> cause. I was under the impression that OIN still provided protection, if
> that is not the case it sadly has to die. But please let's just take a
> breather and get and informed opinion from the legal department before
> massacering desktop functionality here.

One of the major contributors to the OIN was Novell themselves.  So I really 
question what will happen if the OIN needs to come into play.  Will it really 
be usable?  Regardless of the OIN, if Microsoft folks help to add 
functionality to Mono, it will be tainted.  I certainly don't want to look at 
any code that might be tainted.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20061104/11637aaf/attachment.sig>