Proposals for mono-basic and monodoc

[David Nielsen]

lør, 04 11 2006 kl. 16:26 -0500, skrev Jesse Keating:
> On Saturday 04 November 2006 12:22, David Nielsen wrote:
> > Let's just wait and hear what Legal has to say about this first, I'd be
> > mighty upset if Banshee and Beagle was taken from me without proper
> > cause. I was under the impression that OIN still provided protection, if
> > that is not the case it sadly has to die. But please let's just take a
> > breather and get and informed opinion from the legal department before
> > massacering desktop functionality here.
> 
> One of the major contributors to the OIN was Novell themselves.  So I really 
> question what will happen if the OIN needs to come into play.  Will it really 
> be usable?  Regardless of the OIN, if Microsoft folks help to add 
> functionality to Mono, it will be tainted.  I certainly don't want to look at 
> any code that might be tainted.

So how much code are we looking at removing here, clearly Mono must go
if we are to be safe but anything else we might want to lose?

On a different note, should we send flowers to Novells funeral? 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dette er en digitalt underskrevet brevdel
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20061105/76d8fd3f/attachment.sig>